Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 AUGUST 2021

Have you breached the Harman Undertaking? Pardon?

Only a court can release a party from its Harman undertaking, so a breach of the obligation can be contempt of court.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Many interesting issues have arisen in the current litigation involving former Attorney-General, Christian Porter.

The underlying story is of course the one that gets the most headlines. But there are important lessons here for anyone who is regularly involved in litigation, especially where a party wants to utilise documents it has previously obtained in a separate litigation.

The principle

In short, anyone who wants to go down that path should think twice (or more) about doing so.

The principle was clearly stated by the High Court in Hearne v Street (2008) 235 CLR 125, where it said, "when one party to the litigation is compelled, either by reason of a rule of court, or by reason of a specific order of the court, or otherwise, to disclose documents or information, the party obtaining the disclosure cannot, without the leave of the court, use it for any purpose other than that for which it was given unless it is received into evidence".

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from