Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 OCTOBER 2026

Finding Of Professional Misconduct Over Administrative Error By “coordinating Doctor” In Voluntary Assisted Dying Process

A Victorian tribunal found a coordinating doctor guilty of professional misconduct after an administrative error in the voluntary assisted dying process led to a patient signing their written declaration without required witnesses present. The case examines the heightened responsibility practitioners face when managing VAD documentation and the disciplinary consequences of failing to ensure strict compliance with procedural safeguards, even when errors are unintentional.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

As first published in the Australian Health Law Bulletin AHLB 34.5 & 6

This article outlines a decision of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal) arising under the Voluntary Assisted Dying Act 2017 (Vic) (the Act). This decision relates to the conduct of a “coordinating doctor” for a person seeking to access voluntary assisted dying (VAD) under the Act.

As set out in the Act, a coordinating doctor is subject to rules which set out the process by which a person can access VAD. This decision by the Tribunal provides clarity, speaking to the heightened requirement for attention to detail in the care provided to VAD patients and engagement with the process generally.

In this decision, pursuant to s 196 of the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law, Dr Nichols Carr was found to have behaved in a way which constitutes professional misconduct and was ordered to be reprimanded and issued a fine in the amount of $12,000.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from