Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 JUNE 2018

Australian Federal Court Adopts Novel Approach In Dealing With Competing Class Actions

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

Competing class actions, particularly in relation to shareholder claims, have increased in Australia and imposed unnecessary costs on respondents.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In Short

The Situation: Competing class actions, particularly in relation to shareholder claims, have increased in Australia and imposed unnecessary costs on respondents. In Perera v GetSwift Limited [2018] FCA 732, Lee J of the Federal Court of Australia was tasked with managing three competing class actions.

The Result: His Honour ultimately stayed two class actions while allowing the third to continue.

Looking Ahead: The judgment provides useful insight into the various ways in which a court might deal with competing class actions, as well as the justifications and sources of power that may be relied upon to permanently stay a class action.  

Respondents in securities class actions should be aware that:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from