The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

CMS

VIA A. DEPRETIS, 86, 00184 ROME, ITALY
Tel:
Work +39 06 47 81 51
Fax:
Fax +39 06 48 37 55
Email:
Web:
www.cms.law
Aberdeen, Algiers, Amsterdam, Antwerp, Barcelona, Beijing and 70 more
CMS, Italo de Feo, Rome, ITALY

Lawyer rankings

Italo de Feo

Tel:
Work +39 06 478151
Email:
CMS

Work Department

TMC - Technology, Media and Communications

Position

Partner

Career

Italo de Feo is Co-Head of the TMC department – Technology, Media and Communication and is also responsible for the International Technology Group at CMS. Italo joined the firm as Partner in 2012.

Throughout his career, Italo has developed far-reaching expertise in the fields of commercial law, technology and intellectual property law, with particular expertise in matters of technology services outsourcing, software and licenses, internet and telecommunications regulation and privacy issues.
Italo de Feo is both an Italian attorney and an English solicitor.

Languages

Italian, English and German

Member

- Rome Bar Association
- Chairman of the European Outsourcing Association - Italy
- Vice-chair of the Outsourcing Committee of Itechlaw


Italy: Industry focus

TMT

Within: Leading individuals

Italo de Feo - CMS

Within: TMT

CMS has been assisting Intesa Sanpaolo Group’s company Infogroup with a number of outsourcing agreements concerning the supply of IT services to banks, governmental organizations and other clients, and has been advising Italian sport newspaper publisher NES Editoriale on data protection and IP issues involved in the managing and operation of the websites of newspapers Corriere dello Sport and Tuttosport, which contain tools for videos and advertising services. Italo de Feo and associate Marco Leone are names to note.

[back to top]


Back to index

Legal Developments by:
CMS

  • Access to justice: protective costs orders in planning challenges

    Third parties and competing developers have no rights of appeal to the Secretary of State against planning decisions. Disappointed applicants can appeal to the Secretary of State and can have the merits of the application reconsidered. The only remedy available to a disappointed third party is a challenge by way of judicial review in the High Court on a point of law. The sense of frustration and disempowerment this creates has not been helped by the increasing complexity of the planning process and the use of consultation to legitimise decisions that many perceive may already have been taken.
    - CMS Group

Legal Developments in Italy

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to