The Legal 500

Back to Legal500 home

Hickman and Rose

AYLESBURY HOUSE, 17-18 AYLESBURY STREET, LONDON, EC1R 0DB, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 0207 702 5331
Fax:
Fax 0207 253 1367
DX:
53346 CLERKENWELL
Web:
www.hickmanandrose.co.uk
Email:

What we say about the firm's legal practice in London

Crime, fraud and licensing

Within Crime, Hickman and Rose is a first tier firm,

Hickman and Rose is known for its media-savvy approach, which helps to keep its high-profile clients out of the limelight. Its track record includes acting for a 17-year-old defendant in a murder case characterised as a homophobic attack; and defending a mother charged with the murder of her two daughters on the basis of diminished responsibility. Practice head Ross Dixon is ‘excellent’.

Within Fraud: white-collar crime , tier 4

Ben Rose at Hickman and Rose acts for a range of professionals, including politicians suspected of electoral law breaches.

Public sector

Within Administrative and public law, tier 6

Hickman and Rose is noted for judicial review work with a criminal justice and human rights focus.

Within Civil liberties and human rights, Hickman and Rose is a third tier firm,

Hickman and Rose represents victims of crime and suspects in actions against the prison service, the IPCC and the Criminal Cases Review Commission. Daniel Machover, Anna Mazzola and Kate Maynard are singled out in the ‘very good’ team.

Further information on Hickman and Rose

Please choose from this list to view details of what we say about Hickman and Rose in other jurisdictions.

London

Offices in London

Search News and Articles

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to

  • HOUSING

    In Nzinga Maswaku v Westminster City Council [2012] EWCA Civ 669 the Court of Appeal clarified that in offering a homeless person with alternative temporary accommodation the local authority is obliged to point that if the offer is refused it has discharged its Part VII duties under the Housing Act 1996.
    - 11KBW

  • COUNCIL TAX

    In Harrow LBC v Ayiku [2012] EWHC 1200 (Admin) Sales J held that the word “or” in the Council Tax (Exempt Dwellings) Order 1992, art 3 Class N, had a disjunctive meaning, therefore it was sufficient for the non-British spouse of a foreign student to satisfy one or other of the two conditions, namely being prevented from taking paid employment or being prevented from claiming benefits, in order to qualify as a “relevant person” who was exempted from liability to pay council tax.
    - 11KBW

  • QUEEN’S SPEECH

    Bills already introduced pursuant to the Queen’s Speech on 9 May 2012 include Local Government Finance Bill and Electoral Registration and Administration Bill, both accompanied by Explanatory Notes, which in each case address ECHR compatibility.
    - 11KBW

  • Standards

    In R (Calver) v Adjudication Panel for Wales [2012] EWHC 1172 (Admin) Mr Calver was a member of Manorbier Community Council who successfully challenged the decision of the Panel to dismiss his appeal against a decision by Prembrokeshire County Council Standards Committee censuring him for a number of comments or blogs posted by him on a website he owned and controlled.
    - 11KBW

  • A justified retrospective

    Clive Sheldon - QC debates the pros & cons of retrospective tax legislation
    - 11KBW

  • Public Sector Equality Duty (“PSED”)

    In R (Greenwich Community Law Centre) v Greenwich LBC [2012] EWCA Civ 496 the Court of Appeal held that the Council had had “due regard to the PSED when making changes to its funding of community legal advice services”. At para 30 Elias LJ said:
    - 11KBW

  • Public Sector Equality Duty

    Surrey County Council conducted a review of its Library Service. This culminated in a Report to the Council’s Cabinet. The Recommendations in the Report included that there should be consultation about a community-partnership approach at selected Libraries.
    - 11KBW

  • Judicial Review

    The Judgment of Lindblom J in The Manydown Co Ltd v Basingstoke and Deane BC [2012] EWHC 977 (Admin) repays attention. The Claimant sought to challenge by judicial review 2 decisions of the Council: (1) the Council’s refusal to reconsider its position on the development of a site that it owns (and is the subject matter of a Joint Development Partnership Agreement with the Claimant); and (2) a decision of the Council’s Cabinet approving a selection of sites for development which did not include this site.
    - 11KBW

  • The Health and Social Care Act 2012: impact on adult social services

    After its torrid passage through Parliament, the Health and Social Care Bill received Royal Assent on 27 March 2012. The Act deals principally with healthcare reform, but it also contains some amendments to the legislative framework for social care. It will come into force on a day yet to be appointed by the Secretary of State.
    - 11KBW

  • Immigration update May 2012

    In this issue:
    - Penningtons Solicitors LLP
© 2012 www.legal500.com