Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 31 MAY 2016

Cadwalader Attorneys Review Challenges To Standing In Data Privacy And Cybersecurity Cases

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Contributor
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Cadwalader attorneys examined recent data privacy and cyber-security cases that may help class action plaintiffs establish Article III standing in federal court.

United StatesPrivacy

Cadwalader attorneys examined recent data privacy and cyber-security cases that may help class action plaintiffs establish Article III standing in federal court. In a memorandum titled "Dual Decisions Provide Narrow Path for Plaintiffs to Establish Standing in Data Breach and Cybersecurity Suits," Cadwalader attorneys reviewed Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, a Supreme Court case that held that an online search engine's failure to collect and report an individual's personal information accurately was insufficient to establish standing for a class-action lawsuit. The Supreme Court held that a mere technical violation of a consumer protection statute without any indication of alleged harm to the plaintiff failed to constitute an injury that was both "concrete and particularized" and "actual or imminent." Cadwalader attorneys suggested that, going forward, defendants likely will argue that this standard applies to data breach and cybersecurity actions where plaintiffs show

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from