Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 OCTOBER 2004

Court Strikes Down National Security Letter Statute

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

Telephone companies and internet service providers may have a means to resist unreasonable demands for subscriber information under so-called National Security Letters ("NSLs").

United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

Telephone companies and internet service providers may have a means to resist unreasonable demands for subscriber information under so-called National Security Letters ("NSLs"). A federal district court has held that the statute authorizing the FBI to request that such providers produce information concerning their customers violates the providers’ First and Fourth Amendment rights. Doe v. Ashcroft, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19343 (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 28, 2004). The court concluded that the absence of judicial review violates the Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures, and the statutory prohibition against disclosing the FBI request to "any person" violates the First Amendment right to freedom of speech. The district court stayed its decision pending the government’s appeal to the Second Circuit.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from