Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 JUNE 2026

‘Trade Or Commerce’ As A Threshold Issue Under Chapter 93A: Lessons For Professional Services Litigation

Greenberg Traurig
Greenberg Traurig
Contributor
Greenberg Traurig

Greenberg Traurig

Greenberg Traurig, LLP has approximately 3,200 lawyers across 51 locations in the United States,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Greenberg Traurig

A Massachusetts Superior Court ruled that a law firm and its partner were not liable under Chapter 93A for allegedly interfering with a plaintiff's visa status, finding that the defendants' conduct did not occur...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In Vuuren v. Lowenstein Sandler LLP, a Massachusetts Superior Court judge entered summary judgment for the defendant in the plaintiff’s Chapter 93A, Section 11 claim based on the plaintiff’s failure to prove the defendant was acting in “trade or commerce.” The plaintiff, Hugo Van Vuuren, a South African citizen and co-founder of the venture capital fund Xfund, sued law firm Lowenstein Sandler LLP and its partner Marie DeFalco on multiple grounds, including an alleged violation of Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 93A, Section 11. Van Vuuren contended that Lowenstein and DeFalco engaged in unfair or deceptive acts or practices by communicating with U.S. immigration authorities to have his O-1 visa revoked and by allegedly assisting his former business partner, Patrick Chung, in providing information to a U.S. consulate that resulted in Van Vuuren being deemed ineligible for any future visa.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from