ARTICLE · 20 NOVEMBER 2025
Third Circuit Affirms Dismissal Of CIPA Adtech Class Action Because A Party To A Communication Cannot Eavesdrop On Itself
On November 13, 2025, in Cole, et al. v. Quest Diagnostics, Inc., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 29698 (3d Cir. Nov. 13, 2025), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed a ruling...
United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Duane Morris Takeaways: On
November 13, 2025, in Cole, et al. v. Quest Diagnostics, Inc.,
2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 29698 (3d Cir. Nov. 13, 2025), the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed a ruling of the U.S. District Court
for the District of New Jersey's in dismissing a class action
complaint brought by website users against a diagnostic testing
company alleging that the company's use of website advertising
technology violated the California Invasion of Privacy Act
("CIPA") and California's Confidentiality of Medical
Information Act ("CMIA").
The ruling is significant because it confirms two important
principles: (1) CIPA's prohibition against eavesdropping does
not apply to an online advertising company, like Facebook, when it
directly receives information from the users' browser; and (2)
the CMIA is not triggered unless plaintiffs plausibly allege the
disclosure of substantive medical information.
We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.
Disclaimer: This Alert has been prepared and published for informational purposes only and is not offered, nor should be construed, as legal advice. For more information, please see the firm's full disclaimer.
View source