Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 MARCH 2026

Texas Business Court Clarifies Jurisdictional Threshold And "Qualified Transaction" Requirements

Greenberg Traurig
Greenberg Traurig
Contributor
Greenberg Traurig

Greenberg Traurig

Greenberg Traurig, LLP has approximately 3,200 lawyers across 51 locations in the United States,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Greenberg Traurig

The Texas Business Court continues to develop precedent regarding its own jurisdiction. In Angela Yaun v. Battle & Sands Energy Corp., et al., Cause No. 25-BC11B-0094 (Tex. Bus. Ct. Mar. 3, 2026), Judge Grant Dorfman of the Eleventh Division (in Houston) ...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Texas Business Court continues to develop precedent regarding its own jurisdiction. In Angela Yaun v. Battle & Sands Energy Corp., et al., Cause No. 25-BC11B-0094 (Tex. Bus. Ct. Mar. 3, 2026), Judge Grant Dorfman of the Eleventh Division (in Houston) denied a plaintiff's motion to remand, providing guidance on two key jurisdictional questions: what constitutes a "qualified transaction," and which dollar threshold applies following recent legislative changes.

Background and Key Facts

Angela Yaun brought suit against Battle & Sands Energy Corporation and related defendants, alleging they breached an agreement to pay her a perpetual royalty of $1.00 per ton on frac sand sold from a quarry in Beeville, Texas. Her claims included breach of contract, equitable estoppel, quasi-estoppel, fraud, and statutory relief under the Texas Sales Representative Act (TSRA). The defendants removed the case to the Texas Business Court under Texas Government Code § 25A.004(d)(1).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from