Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 JUNE 2018

Supreme Court Rules SEC Practice Of Hiring ALJs Unconstitutional

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Contributor
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

The U.S. Supreme Court (the "Supreme Court") ruled that the SEC practice of hiring administrative law judges ("ALJs") was unconstitutional.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The U.S. Supreme Court (the "Supreme Court") ruled that the SEC practice of hiring administrative law judges ("ALJs") was unconstitutional. In Lucia v. SEC, the Supreme Court overturned a D.C. Court of Appeals ruling and determined that ALJs are "Officers of the United States" ("Officers") and therefore subject to the Appointments Clause of the Constitution. Under the Appointments Clause, Officers must be appointed "by the President, the head of a department, or a court of law."

The Supreme Court relied on its previous decision in Freytag v. Commissioner, which held that special trial judges ("STJs") of the U.S. Tax Court were Officers because they (i) held a continuing office established by the law, and (ii) exercised significant discretion when carrying out "important functions." The "important functions" relied on by the Court in Freytag included "tak[ing] testimony, conduct[ing] trials, rul[ing] on the admissibility of evidence, and hav[ing] the power to

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from