Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 APRIL 2024

Sentencing Guidelines Amendment Prevents Judges From Considering Acquitted Conduct At Sentencing

Katten
Katten
Contributor
Katten

Katten

With client service at our core and a collective desire to foster an inclusive environment for a...

View firm profile
Explore more from Katten

Since the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Watts, 19 US 148 (1997), judges have been permitted to consider acquitted conduct when calculating a defendant's sentencing guidelines range and determining their ultimate sentence.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Since the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Watts, 19 US 148 (1997), judges have been permitted to consider acquitted conduct when calculating a defendant's sentencing guidelines range and determining their ultimate sentence. Lawmakers across the political spectrum have since criticized this practice, raising questions as to whether it conflicts with the Constitution's guarantee that guilt is to be determined by a jury of one's peers. Indeed, the Supreme Court appeared poised to revisit the holding in Wattslast summer but decided not to grant certiorari, leaving the issue unresolved. However, Justices Sotomayor, Kavanaugh, Gorsuch and Coney Barrett all made statements that the practice of considering acquitted conduct at sentencing "raises important questions" and noted that the decision in Watts may need to be addressed if the US Sentencing Commission did not take action.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from