Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 AUGUST 2016

Second Circuit Rejects Argument That Arbitration Clause Was Void Due To Inability To Vindicate Rights Under Title VII And ADA

The Second Circuit recently affirmed in relevant part, an order compelling arbitration of claims under Title VII and the Americans with Disabilities Act in connection with the termination of the plaintiff's employment.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Second Circuit recently affirmed in relevant part, an order compelling arbitration of claims under Title VII and the Americans with Disabilities Act in connection with the termination of the plaintiff's employment. The plaintiff alleged that the six-month limitations period in the arbitration clause did not provide a sufficient opportunity to exhaust administrative remedies, thus rendering the arbitration agreement invalid. The court rejected this argument, holding that it was "not clear" under Title VII and the ADA that the plaintiff "would be required to exhaust administrative remedies prior to arbitration." And even if exhaustion prior to arbitration was required under the law, "an arbitration provision that requires an employment discrimination claim to be arbitrated before statutory exhaustion procedures could possibly be completed is easily construed as reflecting the parties' agreement to waive such requirement, as well as any defense based on

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from