Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 JANUARY 2014

SDNY Strikes A Blow Against Selective Waivers

Katten
Katten
Contributor
Katten

Katten

With client service at our core and a collective desire to foster an inclusive environment for a...

View firm profile
Explore more from Katten

On November 20, 2013, US District Judge Paul G. Gardephe of the US District Court for the Southern District of New York issued a decision with potentially significant consequences for attorneys conducting internal investigations and parties seeking to obtain disclosure of witness interview notes memorializing such investigations.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

On November 20, 2013, US District Judge Paul G. Gardephe of the US District Court for the Southern District of New York issued a decision with potentially significant consequences for attorneys conducting internal investigations and parties seeking to obtain (or shield) disclosure of witness interview notes memorializing such investigations. Gruss v. Zwirn, 09-CV-6441 (S.D.N.Y., Nov. 20, 2013).

Gardephe's ruling, issued in a defamation action brought against a hedge fund by a former employee, followed a request for clarification after an earlier ruling in July 2013. Through the two rulings, Gardephe ordered production, for in-camera inspection by the court, of interview notes prepared by outside counsel for the fund pertaining to 21 witnesses whose statements were obtained in the course of an internal investigation.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from