Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 OCTOBER 2017

Personal Jurisdiction: Subpoena To Foreign Bank Quashed On Due Process Grounds

Arnold & Porter
Arnold & Porter
Contributor
Arnold & Porter

Arnold & Porter

With over 1,000 lawyers across 16 offices worldwide, Arnold & Porter is renowned for its...

View firm profile
Explore more from Arnold & Porter

The Southern District of New York recently quashed a subpoena seeking documents from the Commonwealth of Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited for use in a foreign arbitration proceeding.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Southern District of New York recently quashed a subpoena seeking documents from the Commonwealth of Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (ANZ Bank) for use in a foreign arbitration proceeding. This case was preceded by multi-national litigation between APR Energy Holding Ltd. and Forge Power Pty Ltd., related to a bankruptcy proceeding and four gas turbine generator sets worth millions of dollars. Having lost in the prior litigation, APR initiated arbitration against the Commonwealth of Australia and issued a subpoena seeking relevant information about Forge's finances, given that ANZ Bank is Forge's biggest creditor.

The parties initially disputed whether APR satisfied the criteria for enforcement of a Section 1782 subpoena, namely whether ANZ Bank "resides or is found in New York." ANZ Bank has only one branch office in New York, and this branch accounts only for 2% of the bank's assets, operating income and profit, and 0.3% of its employees. The

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from