Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 MAY 2017

MDL Update:This Month At The Panel

Arnold & Porter
Arnold & Porter
Contributor
Arnold & Porter

Arnold & Porter

With over 1,000 lawyers across 16 offices worldwide, Arnold & Porter is renowned for its...

View firm profile
Explore more from Arnold & Porter

The following recent developments at the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation provide some practical pointers when facing litigation in multiple jurisdictions.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The following recent developments at the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation provide some practical pointers when facing litigation in multiple jurisdictions.

MDL Decision to Watch: Dial Up an MDL?

Earlier this month, the Panel denied a motion to create an MDL for six antitrust actions arising from alleged reciprocal "bidding agreements" regarding online advertising of contact lenses. The motion, opposed by defendant 1-800 Contacts, included four actions in the District of Utah and two actions in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Although not part of the original MDL petition, a related action was also pending in the Eastern District of Arkansas.

  • The Panel noted there was no dispute that the actions should be litigated together.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from