Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 OCTOBER 2026

Increasing Scrutiny Of "Schedule A" Intellectual Property Litigation

Masuda, Funai, Eifert & Mitchell, Ltd.
Explore more from Masuda, Funai, Eifert & Mitchell, Ltd.

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals has issued a significant ruling that challenges the procedural foundations of Schedule A litigation, a practice that has allowed intellectual property owners to sue hundreds of foreign online merchants simultaneously while obtaining asset freezes before defendants are even aware of the lawsuits. This decision, coupled with increased judicial scrutiny in the Northern District of Illinois...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Executive Summary

  • Schedule A litigation allows intellectual property owners to sue dozens or even hundreds of foreign online merchants in a single lawsuit, simply referring to them on the Complaint as the “Schedule A Defendants,” in which plaintiffs often seek ex parte injunctive relief restraining the merchants’ sales and freezing funds associated with their online marketplace accounts.
  • For more than a decade, the Northern District of Illinois has been one of the most frequent venues for such lawsuits. Recent decisions, however, including a Seventh Circuit decision issued in March 2026, have subjected Schedule A litigation to increased scrutiny.

The Seventh Circuit Weighs in on “Schedule A” Litigation:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from