Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 FEBRUARY 2015

Disproving The "Case-Within-The-Case" In Malpractice Lawsuits

In malpractice cases such as this one, attorneys seek to poke as many holes as possible in the very same cases which they were once vigorously advocating on behalf of their former clients.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In a decision with significant potential ramifications for malpractice cases in New Jersey, Judge Joseph A. Dickson, U.S. Magistrate Judge for the District of New Jersey, held this past week that a lawyer being sued for malpractice in connection with his representation in underlying wrongful death lawsuit may seek discovery of potentially mitigating evidence about the accident forming the basis of the underlying lawsuit – even if the discovery was not explored in the underlying case itself. In this specific case, the judge ruled that the attorney being sued for malpractice could conduct discovery focusing on whether the decedent in the wrongful death case had consumed alcoholic beverages the night he fell to his death down an under-construction elevator shaft at a resort in Mexico.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from