Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 JUNE 2026

Delaware Rulings Point To Governance Litigation’s Ideal Window

Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
Contributor
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP

Boies Schiller Flexner LLP

Boies Schiller Flexner is a firm of internationally recognized trial lawyers, crisis managers, and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Boies Schiller Flexner LLP

Delaware Supreme Court decisions issued this year have invoked timing to dismiss stockholder challenges to governance arrangements, with one case finding the dispute unripe and another finding the dispute untimely.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Timing is everything—in life and in Delaware.

Delaware Supreme Court decisions issued this year have invoked timing to dismiss stockholder challenges to governance arrangements, with one case finding the dispute unripe and another finding the dispute untimely.

These rulings clarify when stockholder challenges to governance decisions may appropriately be brought.

Too Early

In April, the Delaware Supreme Court, in In re AES Corporation, affirmed the dismissal of two stockholder challenges to advance notice bylaws as unripe.

Advance notice bylaws are the provisions in a corporation’s bylaws that specify timing and informational requirements for shareholders to nominate directors or vote on other matters. They’ve been a hot topic in Delaware over the last few years. Corporations have made the requirements to nominate directors increasingly complex, and a wave of litigation has ensued.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from