Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 JUNE 2025

Court Of Appeals Upholds Contract Merger Clause

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Contributor
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

In Behler v. Kai-Shing Tao, the New York Court of Appeals found that the merger clause contained in a limited liability company agreement governed by Delaware law...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In Behler v. Kai-Shing Tao,the New York Court of Appeals found that the merger clause contained in a limited liability company agreement governed by Delaware law superseded an alleged prior oral agreement between the parties, despite their history of conducting business through oral arrangements.

Facts:

In 2012, Kai-Shing Tao ("Tao"), the CEO and Chairman of Remark Holdings, Inc. ("Remark"), asked his "close friend" Albert Behler ("Behler") to invest in Digipac LLC ("Digipac"), a special purpose vehicle created by Tao to hold shares of Remark. Behler initially expressed concerns about the liquidity of such an investment, citing "the inherent difficulty in liquidating shares of a limited liability company". To address these concerns, the parties entered into an oral agreement whereby Behler invested $3 million in Digipac, receiving a 24.14% stake in Digipac, and Tao promised Behler two exit strategies:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from