Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 OCTOBER 2026

Court Evaluates AI-Related Provisions In Discovery Protective Orders

Greenberg Traurig
Greenberg Traurig
Contributor
Greenberg Traurig

Greenberg Traurig

Greenberg Traurig, LLP has approximately 3,200 lawyers across 51 locations in the United States,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Greenberg Traurig

As generative AI becomes increasingly integrated into litigation workflows, courts are grappling with how these tools should be used with confidential discovery materials. A recent Colorado district court decision examines the balance between enabling AI-assisted legal work and protecting sensitive information, distinguishing between consumer-grade platforms and enterprise tools with robust safeguards.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

As generative AI becomes more common in litigation workflows, courts are increasingly being asked to address how AI tools may be used with confidential discovery materials.

A recent decision from the District of Colorado provides insights into one court’s approach to generative AI in discovery. The ruling distinguishes between public consumer AI tools and enterprise platforms with specified safeguards, while addressing proposed provisions requiring approval before new AI tools may be used.

Areas of Disagreement Regarding AI Tool Use

In this consumer dispute, the parties agreed that discovery material was confidential. After a hearing, they even agreed on a cutting-edge artificial intelligence provision for their protective order.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from