Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 JANUARY 2026

Another Court Rules CASA Does Not Limit Universal Relief Available Under The APA

Crowell & Moring LLP
Crowell & Moring LLP
Contributor
Crowell & Moring LLP

Crowell & Moring LLP

Crowell & Moring’s Doha office is a full service legal practice that serves as the firm’s regional...

View firm profile
Explore more from Crowell & Moring LLP

District courts retain authority to "set aside" agency actions universally under 5 U.S.C. § 706, and to preliminarily stay those actions as to all under 5 U.S.C. § 705...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

What You Need to Know

  • Key takeaway #1

Trump v. CASA does not restrict the scope of relief available under the APA.

  • Key takeaway #2

District courts retain authority to “set aside” agency actions universally under 5 U.S.C. § 706, and to preliminarily stay those actions as to all under 5 U.S.C. § 705—not just as to named plaintiffs.

In Trump v. CASA, the Supreme Court significantly constrained the equitable authority of federal district courts to grant universal or nationwide injunctive relief, clarifying that, with specific exceptions, a federal court's power to grant relief is limited to the parties before it. When it was issued, many bemoaned CASA's implications for preventing government overreach.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from