Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

PODCAST · 11 JUNE 2024

Allocation: Debunking The "Partial" Duty To Defend Myth (Podcast)

Lowenstein Sandler LLP
Lowenstein Sandler LLP
Contributor
Lowenstein Sandler LLP

Lowenstein Sandler LLP

Lowenstein Sandler LLP is a national law firm with over 400 lawyers based in New York, Palo Alto,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Lowenstein Sandler LLP

In this episode of "Don't Take No for an Answer," Lynda A. Bennett and Alexander B. Corson explore the complex issue of "allocation" in the context of defense costs in insurance claims.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

1477188a.jpg

In this episode of "Don't Take No for an Answer," Lynda A. Bennett and Alexander B. Corson explore the complex issue of "allocation" in the context of defense costs in insurance claims. They discuss what steps to take when insurers attempt to shift part of their coverage obligations onto policyholders in a reservation of rights (ROR) letter, the common law approach to allocation, and the implications of "allocation" provisions in policies. The conversation also addresses whether the allocation question changes when an insurer has a duty to reimburse versus a duty to defend.

Speakers:

Lynda A. Bennett, Partner and Chair, Insurance Recovery
Alexander B. Corson
, Associate, Insurance Recovery

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from