Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 MARCH 2012

Seventh Circuit Approves Both "Untimely" Interlocutory Appeal And Issue-Specific Class Certification

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Contributor
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Class or collective actions form an increasingly important of international practice. In the pursuit and evolution of that practice, as we have posted before, tribunals elsewhere follow the development of U.S. class action law and practice.

United StatesInternational Law

Class or collective actions form an increasingly important of international practice. In the pursuit and evolution of that practice, as we have posted before, tribunals elsewhere follow the development of U.S. class action law and practice.

George McReynolds, et al. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., No. 11-3639 (7th Cir. 2012), presents a careful analysis of two recurring issues: first, whether the time limits for an interlocutory appeal of a class action order is statutory or jurisdiction on the one hand or something closer to discretionary on the other; and, second, what effect the Supreme Court's decision in Wal-Mart Stores v. Dukes, 131 S. Ct. 2541 (2011), might have had on cases of huge numbers of potential class members.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from