Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 APRIL 2025

Trending At The PTAB: A Pivot On Discretionary Denials

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Contributor
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP is one of the world’s largest firms focusing on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

On Feb. 28, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office rescinded former Director Kathi Vidal's June 2022 memorandum outlining an interim procedure for discretionary denials.

United StatesIntellectual Property

On Feb. 28, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office rescinded former Director Kathi Vidal's June 2022 memorandum outlining an interim procedure for discretionary denials.

In the notice rescinding the Vidal memorandum, the USPTO advised that portions of decisions relying on the Vidal memo will no longer be considered binding, or even persuasive.

Further, it instructed parties to post-grant proceedings to rely on prior PTAB precedential decisions for guidance, including the March 2020 decision in Apple Inc. v. Fintiv Inc. and the December 2020 decision Sotera Wireless Inc. v. Masimo Corp.

On March 24, the USPTO issued a memorandum providing new guidance consistent with the state of the board before the Vidal memorandum, and reintroducing challenges that petitioners previously faced before the Vidal memorandum.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from