Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 FEBRUARY 2018

No Rehearing Because Of Hindsight Declaring

Akin
Akin
Contributor
Akin

Akin

Akin is a global law firm with more than 1,100 lawyers and advisors who pride themselves on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Akin

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) denied a petitioner's request for rehearing of its decision declining institution of inter partes review of a patent owned by Bose Corporation ("Patent Owner.")

United StatesIntellectual Property

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) denied a petitioner's request for rehearing of its decision declining institution of inter partes review of a patent owned by Bose Corporation ("Patent Owner.") The PTAB upheld its finding that the supporting declaration of Petitioner's expert relied on "a far too general reason" to combine prior art, was conclusory, and engaged in impermissible hindsight.

Petitioner argued that certain patent claims directed to an in-ear earpiece were invalid in view of prior art references Howes and Sapiejewski. In its supporting declaration, Petitioner's expert opined that Howes discloses a "known, retention problem with in-ear earpieces" that, because of their "weight and overall size" in-ear earpieces, have a tendency to fall out of the ear. Petitioner's expert also opined that Sapiejewski's in-ear earpiece would have had this same retention problem because of its weight and overall size, and, thus, a person of ordinary skill in the art

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from