Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 APRIL 2024

More Lessons From Mumbai – Reflections On A Hatch-Waxman And PIV Litigation Panel Discussion

Axinn LLP
Axinn LLP
Contributor
Axinn LLP

Axinn LLP

Incisive. Inclusive. Invested. We’re Axinn. Experienced, tenacious, and always trial-ready, we are...

View firm profile
Explore more from Axinn LLP

Reflecting back on our time at the 13th Annual Pharma IPR Conference in Mumbai, there was a lively discussion during the panel that I moderated on Industry Insights...

United StatesIntellectual Property
Axinn Veltrop & Harkrider
Axinn Veltrop & Harkrider

Reflecting back on our time at the 13th Annual Pharma IPR Conference in Mumbai, there was a lively discussion during the panel that I moderated on Industry Insights on Hatch-Waxman and Paragraph IV Litigation. The legal issues facing generic pharmaceutical companies are constantly in flux, and it was interesting to receive insights from the panelists – Gautam Bakshi, Head & Patent Counsel – Intellectual Property Management at Unichem Laboratories, Kaushal Joshi, Sr. Director IP & Legal at Kashiv BioSciences, and Madhav Trivedi, Associate Director IPR at Arcolab Private Ltd (a Strides group company).

Induced infringement issues and labeling carveouts following GSK v. Teva are always hot topics at pharmaceutical patent conferences. The panelists explained that, when facing method-of-use patents, their internal teams always start by evaluating whether it is possible to avoid such patents by carving out indications or language from their proposed product

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

UMG v. DistroKid: When AI Becomes A Consumer Protection Issue

Universal Music Group's lawsuit against DistroKid raises a critical question about AI disclosure in consumer markets: when does the use of artificial intelligence become material information that must be disclosed to consumers? The case centers on allegations that DistroKid distributed mass-generated AI music while creating the impression it was created by legitimate human artists, potentially violating existing consumer protection laws even without specific AI disclosure requirements.
United StatesIntellectual Property
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC
Article

PTAB/USPTO Update - October 2026

The USPTO has released new templates and guidance for AIA trial proceedings, announced key appointments including a Chief AI Officer, and published updated procedures for patent applications and subject matter eligibility declarations. Director Squires delivered multiple addresses emphasizing the constitutional importance of intellectual property rights while the agency expanded its community engagement efforts and international collaboration through WIPO's Global IP Assignment Platform pilot program.
United StatesIntellectual Property
WilmerHale
WilmerHale
Article

The Trademark Scam Field Guide: Look-Alike Filing Sites, Fake USPTO Notices, And How To Get Out If You’ve Been Caught

A business decides to file a trademark. Someone on the team searches for a familiar online legal-services brand, clicks the first result, and lands on a site with a similar-sounding name, a polished design, five-star reviews, and a low flat fee. The application gets filed. Months later the business learns the “service” was not who they thought it was, the filing was signed by someone with no authority to sign it, and the USPTO has suspended the application along with hundreds or thousands of others from the same shop.
United StatesIntellectual Property
Harness IP
Harness IP
Article

Is This Real? Navigating AI Impersonation Under New And Existing Laws

Is this AI-generated, or is it real? As generative AI tools have become increasingly capable of creating realistic images, videos, and audio, they have also made it easier to impersonate real people without their consent. In response, states are increasingly adopting laws that impose civil and criminal liability for certain AI-generated content that replicates an individual’s identity, likeness, voice, or other personal attributes.
United StatesIntellectual Property
Wiley Rein
Wiley Rein
Article

Right To Repair Alert: Deere & Company Reaches Settlement With FTC, States

The Federal Trade Commission and five State Attorneys General have reached a landmark settlement with Deere & Company in a year-and-a-half antitrust litigation over the agricultural equipment manufacturer's restrictions on repair resources. The stipulated order, if approved, will require Deere to provide farmers and independent repair providers with the same repair tools and technical resources available to authorized dealers for a period of ten years.
United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law
Axinn LLP
Axinn LLP
Article

Henkel/Liquid Nails: The Evidence That Drove The Court’s Merger Decision

The Southern District of New York’s decision permanently enjoining Henkel’s proposed $725 million acquisition of Liquid Nails from American Industrial Partners (AIP) shows how courts may evaluate horizontal mergers of established, differentiated brands sold through concentrated retail channels. It also shows how the current FTC approaches deal challenges. The Court described Loctite and Liquid Nails as “the true behemoths of the industry.” It granted the injunction on August 14, 2026, after a seven-day trial, and released the full redacted decision on September 11.
United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law
Axinn LLP
Axinn LLP
Article

Another HSR Penalty Record: KKR’s $250 Million Settlement

The Department of Justice has secured a proposed $250 million settlement with KKR & Co. Inc. for alleged Hart-Scott-Rodino Act violations spanning at least 16 transactions in 2021 and 2022. This unprecedented penalty, more than twenty times the previous record, marks a dramatic escalation in HSR enforcement and raises critical questions about filing compliance standards across the investment industry.
United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law
Axinn LLP
Axinn LLP
Article

Anti-Steering Provisions Remain In Antitrust Limelight As Class Action Lawsuits Proceed Through Court

Two healthcare providers face class action lawsuits challenging their use of anti-steering and anti-tiering contract provisions that allegedly prevent insurers from designing cost-effective healthcare plans. These follow-on cases emerge after government enforcement actions, with courts finding sufficient evidence of market power and anticompetitive effects to allow the litigation to proceed.
United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law
Axinn LLP
Axinn LLP
Article

What Companies Should Know About California’s COMPETE Act

California's new COMPETE Act introduces a "substantial market power" standard for monopolization cases that may reach companies below federal antitrust thresholds. The law takes effect January 1, 2027, and applies to exclusive contracts, bundled offerings, platform rules, and decisions affecting rivals, suppliers, or workers. Companies with significant California operations face potential scrutiny from the Attorney General and district attorneys under this broader enforcement framework.
United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law
Axinn LLP
Axinn LLP
Article

“Old Crime, New Code” – DOJ Outlines Its Views On When Software And AI Can Facilitate Collusion

The Department of Justice's Criminal Deputy outlines how antitrust enforcement applies to algorithmic pricing tools, distinguishing between legitimate software use and illegal collusion. When do pricing algorithms cross the line from benign business tools into criminal price-fixing conspiracies, and what evidence will prosecutors seek to prove competitors knowingly coordinated through shared data and common models?
United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law
Axinn LLP
Axinn LLP