Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 JUNE 2014

Key Developments In U.S. Patent Law

A&O Shearman
A&O Shearman
Contributor

A&O Shearman

Introducing A&O Shearman Unparalleled global depth for a changing world. Today more than ever,...

View firm profile
Explore more from A&O Shearman

In this newsletter, we provide an overview of the significant developments in patent litigation in the United States during the first six months of 2014.

United StatesIntellectual Property

In this newsletter, we provide an overview of the significant developments in patent litigation in the United States during the first six months of 2014.

Fee Shifting

Supreme Court Lowers Standard for Awarding Fees to a Prevailing Party

Since 1952, courts in the United States have had the authority to award attorney's fees to the prevailing party in "exceptional" patent infringement cases. This authority, which is codified at 35 U.S.C. § 285, is a departure from the typical rule in U.S. courts that each party must pay its own fees.

In 2005, the Federal Circuit held in Brooks Furniture that a case is only "exceptional" under § 285 if it involves "material misconduct" or was both objectively and subjectively baseless. As a result of this high standard, it became nearly impossible for a prevailing party to obtain fees under § 285. On April 28, 2014, the Supreme Court decided two cases which changed the rules for fee shifting in patent cases. In a 9-0 decision

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from