Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 31 DECEMBER 2015

Introducing: IPR And CBM Instituted Claim Survival Rate By Technology Center

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Contributor
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP is one of the world’s largest firms focusing on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Through December 1, 2015, the PTAB has ruled on the patentability of 9,351 instituted claims through final written decisions in IPR and CBM proceedings...

United StatesIntellectual Property

Through December 1, 2015, the PTAB has ruled on the patentability of 9,351 instituted claims through final written decisions in IPR and CBM proceedings, with 7,442 (79.58%) instituted claims being cancelled by the PTAB, 1,571 (16.80%) instituted claims surviving, and 339 (3.62%) instituted claims being conceded by the patent owner. More detailed cumulative disposition statistics on the Board's IPR and CBM decisions, updated through December 1, 2015, are available here on the AIA Blog.

It is clear, however, that the Board has not disposed of patent claims equally across the various technology centers to which the Board assigns its cases. While the overall survival rate of instituted claims across all technology centers through December1 is 16.80%, a number reflecting both claims cancelled by the Board and claims conceded by patent owners, the survival rates of claims in certain technology centers deviate substantially from the mean.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from