Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 MAY 2025

Institution Denied For Insufficient Publication Evidence

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

On October 29, 2024, BabyBjörn AB ("BabyBjörn") filed two separate petitions for inter partes review ("IPR") of U.S. Patent No. 11,786,055 ("the '055 Patent"), which is assigned to The ERGO Baby...

United StatesIntellectual Property

On October 29, 2024, BabyBjörn AB ("BabyBjörn") filed two separate petitions for inter partes review ("IPR") of U.S. Patent No. 11,786,055 ("the '055 Patent"), which is assigned to The ERGO Baby Carrier, Inc. ("ERGO Baby"). ERGO Baby had previously asserted the '055 Patent against BabyBjörn in the Western District of Texas on February 9, 2024. The '055 Patent describes an adjustable child carrier designed to ergonomically support a child as the child grows. Each petition challenged the same claims as unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103 in view of different prior art combinations.

Several of BabyBjörn's asserted unpatentability grounds relied on the "BabyBjörn Baby Carrier Synergy Owners Manual" ("Manual") as a prior art reference. BabyBjörn AB v. The ERGO Baby Carrier, Inc., IPR2025-00110, Paper 20 at 7–8 (P.T.A.B. Apr. 22, 2025). Importantly, the only basis in the petition for the Manual's status as a prior art printed publication was a parenthetical in a

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from