Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 JULY 2012

Class Certification Granted For Claims Against Office Depot

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Contributor
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Because of the importance to international practice generally of class or collective actions, on which we have posted with some frequency from time to time, we report on the decision in Provine, et al. v. Office Depot, Inc., No. C 11-00903 SI (N.D. Cal. 2012).

United StatesIntellectual Property

Because of the importance to international practice generally of class or collective actions, on which we have posted with some frequency from time to time, we report on the decision in Provine, et al. v. Office Depot, Inc.,  No. C 11-00903 SI (N.D. Cal. 2012). 

Office Depot offered a program to its employees known as the Bravo Award Program.  The Program allegedly rewards employees for superior work performance.  The named plaintiff received $50 in awards twice and complained that the Company should have factored in the amounts received in its calculation of "regular rate of pay" for purposes of computing overtime.  Office Depot disagreed.  Class certification was sought on claims relating alleged failure to pay overtime wages, failure to provide accurate wage statements, and related state law claims. 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from