Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 JUNE 2026

Beauty Dupes - Why Brands Need To Think Beyond The Box

Marks & Clerk
Marks & Clerk
Contributor
Marks & Clerk

Marks & Clerk

Marks & Clerk LLP was founded in 1887 by George Croydon Marks, who was joined in partnership by...

View firm profile
Explore more from Marks & Clerk

Glow Recipe's expanded lawsuit against MCoBeauty and Target represents a strategic evolution in how beauty brands combat dupes, moving beyond traditional packaging disputes to challenge the entire digital ecosystem that enables...

United StatesIntellectual Property

It is interesting to see how the dupe debate continues to evolve in the beauty sector.

In this recent US lawsuit, Glow Recipe’s expanded claim against MCoBeauty (now also naming Target) signals a more sophisticated approach to brand protection and enforcement.

Rather than focusing purely on product name and packaging similarities, the case targets the full commercial ecosystem behind dupes, spanning keyword advertising, social media, product listings, and retailer-driven discovery - all of which guide how consumers discover and compare products.

What stands out is the focus on how consumers engage with and find these products, and the shift in how brands are approaching dupe-related disputes. The argument moves beyond point-of-sale confusion and the overall look and feel of the products in question, to how consumers found the product in the first place.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from