Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 AUGUST 2026

Rewriting the Rules: Inside the UKIPO's New Practice Note on AI Patentability

Marks & Clerk
Marks & Clerk
Contributor
Marks & Clerk

Marks & Clerk

Marks & Clerk LLP was founded in 1887 by George Croydon Marks, who was joined in partnership by...

View firm profile
Explore more from Marks & Clerk

The UK Intellectual Property Office has released new guidance following the Supreme Court's landmark decision in Emotional Perception AI Ltd v Comptroller-General, fundamentally changing how AI and computer-implemented inventions are examined in the UK.

United KingdomIntellectual Property

Following the UK Supreme Court’s decision in Emotional Perception AI Ltd v Comptroller-General (“Emotional Perception”), the UKIPO has released updated guidance on the search and examination of AI inventions, and computer implemented inventions more generally. The practice note, issued on 14 July 2026, reemphasises the use of the Pozzoli approach and requires that examiners reevaluate excluded matter objections, disregarding Aerotel. The practical prosecution guidance leaves two questions that may need to be answered by the courts in the future: what constitutes technical character, and when should technical character be assessed relative to the prior art. 

The practice note provides guidance for applying the three-step approach in practice, instructing examiners not to apply the Aerotel test. In a significant change to UK practice, the UKIPO directed examiners not to follow sections 1.07 to 1.51.7 of the Manual of Patent Practice, leaving EPO guidance to fill the gap until the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from