Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 MAY 2026

Insurance Coverage Leasing Lessons From A Slip-and-Fall Dispute

Katten
Katten
Contributor
Katten

Katten

With client service at our core and a collective desire to foster an inclusive environment for a...

View firm profile
Explore more from Katten

Landlords in New York state should take immediate steps to confirm that their tenants’ insurance policies properly name them as additional insureds.

United StatesInsurance

Landlords in New York state should take immediate steps to confirm that their tenants’ insurance policies properly name them as additional insureds. The new owner/landlord should also ensure that, when a property is sold, the tenant’s insurer issues an updated rider, schedule or endorsement naming the new owner/landlord as an additional insured. A recent decision from the Southern District of New York underscores why these steps matter, as well as the significant role insurance policy provisions play in slip-and-fall cases, particularly between landlords and tenants.

In Accredited Surety and Casualty Co. v. Utica First Insurance Co., the court addressed whether a property owner was entitled to coverage as an additional insured under its tenant’s commercial general liability policy in connection with an underlying slip-and-fall action. The case arose when the plaintiff was allegedly injured at a property in Washington Heights after a fall caused by hazardous ramp conditions. The

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from