Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 FEBRUARY 2020

OT Protesters Looking For A Place To Land

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

The Federal District Court for the District of Arizona recently dismissed MD Helicopters' Other Transaction ("OT") protest for lack of jurisdiction.

United StatesGovernment, Public Sector

In Short

The Situation: The Federal District Court for the District of Arizona recently dismissed MD Helicopters' Other Transaction ("OT") protest for lack of jurisdiction. The court reasoned that, although the OT was not a procurement contract, it was still a contract with the government and was "connected to" a procurement. Under the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act of 1996 ("ADRA") and the Tucker Act, only the Court of Federal Claims ("COFC") has jurisdiction to hear cases involving alleged violations of statute or regulation in connection with a procurement or a proposed procurement.

The Result: This has created a situation where protesters cannot easily determine what forum will have jurisdiction to hear protests of the solicitation or award of OT Agreements. In determining the proper forum, protesters will need to assess all of the facts surrounding the OT and later procurement.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from