Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 FEBRUARY 2026

Grand Juries: No Longer A 'Rubber Stamp'

Ballard Spahr LLP
Ballard Spahr LLP
Contributor
Ballard Spahr LLP

Ballard Spahr LLP

Ballard Spahr LLP, an AmLaw 100 law firm with 19 US offices, serves clients in more than 50...

View firm profile
Explore more from Ballard Spahr LLP

In our previous Alert on this topic, we discussed an early round of federal grand jury "no-bills," in which jurors declined ...

United StatesGovernment, Public Sector

Summary

In our previous Alert on this topic, we discussed an early round of federal grand jury "no-bills," in which jurors declined to return indictments sought by prosecutors. What initially appeared to be isolated outcomes now looks more like the beginning of a pattern. Recent grand jury decisions refusing to indict in several high-profile political matters—including proposed charges against six Democratic lawmakers and New York Attorney General Letitia James—suggest a structural shift in the federal charging process. Taken together, these results indicate that, amid reports of weakened internal Department of Justice (DOJ) vetting for politically sensitive cases, grand juries are increasingly operating as a meaningful check on prosecutorial overreach, filtering questionable cases before a formal prosecution ever begins.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from