Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 SEPTEMBER 2018

Futures Trader And Firm Settles CFTC "Spoofing" Charges

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Contributor
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

A futures trader and trading firm agreed to pay $2.3 million to settle CFTC charges related to a "spoofing" scheme to create the appearance of an order book imbalance.

United StatesFinance and Banking

A futures trader and trading firm agreed to pay $2.3 million to settle CFTC charges related to a "spoofing" scheme to create the appearance of an order book imbalance.

According to the Orders (see here and here), Victory Asset, Inc. ("Victory") and Michael D. Franko took part in a spoofing scheme (i.e. "bidding or offering with the intent to cancel the bid or offer before execution") regarding copper and gold futures contracts offered on the Commodity Exchange and light sweet crude oil futures offered on the New York Mercantile Exchange. The scheme also involved "cross-market spoofing" - i.e., spoofing in one market to benefit a position in another market.

Victory and Mr. Franko neither admitted to nor denied the charges. Victory agreed to pay $1.8 million in penalties and Mr. Franko agreed to pay $500,000.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from