Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 AUGUST 2021

Firm Settles NYSE Charges For Routing Violations

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Contributor
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

A full-service broker-dealer firm settled NYSE charges for routing competing orders for the same security at the same price, for the account of the same principal, to two different floor brokers.

United StatesFinance and Banking

A full-service broker-dealer firm settled NYSE charges for routing competing orders for the same security at the same price, for the account of the same principal, to two different floor brokers. The firm also settled related charges for maintaining an inadequate supervisory system that was not designed to prevent such competing orders.

In a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver, and Consent, NYSE found that a firm trader routed "two competing parent orders on behalf of two different portfolios managed by the same advisor to two different floor broker firms," resulting in orders executed at the same time and price on behalf of the same customers. NYSE stated that these executions were in contravention, "albeit unintentionally," of NYSE Rule 122 ("Orders with More than One Broker").

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from