Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 APRIL 2016

Current Structuring May Not Shield Private Equity Firms From ERISA Liabilities

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Contributor
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

On March 28, 2016, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts held that two private equity funds within Sun Capital were jointly and severally liable under ERISA...

United StatesEmployment and HR

On March 28, 2016, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts held that two private equity funds within Sun Capital were jointly and severally liable under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA), for the $4.5 million multiemployer pension plan withdrawal liability of a portfolio company. This landmark decision appreciably changes the landscape for private equity investment in companies with pension plans or potential pension liabilities.

Practical Takeaways

Whether the analytical principles underpinning the Sun Capital decisions spread beyond the First Circuit or impact other areas of the law where controlled group concepts apply is an open question. However, even outside of the First Circuit, private equity firms and those buying portfolio companies from private equity owners should consider the following in light of Sun Capital:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from