Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 MAY 2012

Plea Bargaining In US Under Judicial Scrutiny

De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
Contributor
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek

De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek

Our clients are increasingly operating in South-East Asia and require legal assistance in the...

View firm profile
Explore more from De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek

The Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution gives a criminal defendant a right to a fair trial. On 21 March 2012, the US Supreme Court ruled that this constitutional right also includes a right to an effective lawyer during plea bargaining negotiations.

United StatesCriminal Law

The Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution gives a criminal defendant a right to a fair trial. On 21 March 2012, the US Supreme Court ruled that this constitutional right also includes a right to an effective lawyer during plea bargaining negotiations. Consequently, the right of effective counsel in all parts of a criminal proceeding is strengthened by applying it to the entire plea bargaining process.

The US Supreme Court formulated this new standard in two recent cases (Missouri v Frye and Lafler v Cooper), in which legal advice of counsel led the defendant to reject a favourable plea bargain. The Supreme Court argued that had the lawyers counselled the defendants well, they would have taken the shorter sentence. To win a challenge under this new standard, a defendant must show that with effective counsel, he would have taken a plea offer, the judge would have approved it and the deal would have been more favourable than the actual case's outcome. As

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from