Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 JANUARY 2016

Significant 2015 Decisions Affecting Private M&A

Arnold & Porter
Arnold & Porter
Contributor
Arnold & Porter

Arnold & Porter

With over 1,000 lawyers across 16 offices worldwide, Arnold & Porter is renowned for its...

View firm profile
Explore more from Arnold & Porter

As a second argument, Incline attempted to avoid the exclusive representations language by claiming that it did not apply in the case of fraudulent omissions.

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

Originally published by Law360

The following is Kaye Scholer's second annual review of significant Delaware court decisions relating to private merger and acquisitions transactions and disputes.This article was published as a three-part series in Law360 the week of January 11, 2016. 

Read Part 1: Proxy Contests and Other Disputes Involving the Board on Law360

Read Part 2: Fraud Claims in M&A Transactions | Deal Mechanics on Law360

Read Part 3: Employee and Options Matters | Ratification of Corporate Acts on Law360


Proxy Contests and Other Disputes Involving the Board

1. Elite Horse Investments Ltd. v. T3 Motion Inc., C.A. No. 10550-CB (Del. Ch. Jan. 23, 2015)

This decision serves as a reminder to companies engaging in equity financings that they should consider the risk of investors undertaking a hostile change of control. The decision also provides guidance on three statutory provisions of Delaware law, including that stockholder-written consents

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from