Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 JULY 2020

Second Circuit Denies Challenge To Reg. BI

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Contributor
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied a petition filed by several attorneys general and investment advisers challenging the legality of the SEC's adoption of Regulation Best Interest.

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied a petition filed by several state attorneys general and various investment advisers (collectively, the "Petitioners") challenging the legality of the SEC's adoption of Regulation Best Interest ("Reg. BI").

As previously covered, New York Attorney General Letitia James and several other state attorneys general sued the SEC in 2019, alleging that Reg. BI is contrary to the intent of Congress, and undermines critical consumer protections concerning retail investors. That complaint, consolidated with others, later evolved into a rulemaking challenge under SEA Section 25(b) (i.e., direct proceedings at the appellate level).

The Second Circuit denied the petition for review, finding that (i) Reg. BI is authorized under Section 913(f) of Dodd-Frank and (ii) its adoption was not "arbitrary and capricious" for purposes of the Administrative Procedure Act. The Court said that while Reg. BI "may not be the policy that

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from