Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 JANUARY 2019

Law Professors Propose Tests For Determining Which Digital Assets Are Securities

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Contributor
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

University of Chicago Professor M. Todd Henderson and NYU Professor Max Raskin proposed an operational test for determining whether a digital asset should be considered a security under Securities Act Sections 2 and 3.

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

University of Chicago Professor M. Todd Henderson and NYU Professor Max Raskin proposed an operational test for determining whether a digital asset should be considered a security under Securities Act Sections 2 and 3. The professors described how to apply the Howey test for an "investment contract" to digital assets in order to determine which types of digital assets should be regulated as securities. The professors propose a test to (i) identify which digital assets are "sufficiently decentralized," so that they should not be considered "securities" (as there are no promoters or issuers), and (ii) distinguish those digital assets purchased for investment purposes, which should be classified as "securities," from those purchased for utility or consumption, which should fall outside the scope of securities regulation.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from