Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 MARCH 2013

Jury Rejects Chinese Vitamin C Maker's Foreign Compulsion Defense

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Contributor
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

A jury has returned a verdict against vitamin C manufacturer Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical and its parent, North China Pharmaceutical Group, for violating American antitrust law.

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

A jury has returned a verdict against vitamin C manufacturer Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical and its parent, North China Pharmaceutical Group, for violating American antitrust law. In finding for the plaintiffs, the jury rejected the Chinese companies' defense that their conduct had been compelled by the Chinese government. The jury found that the plaintiffs had sustained damages of $54.1 million, which was trebled under U.S. antitrust law for a total award of $162.3 million.1 Prior to the jury verdict, three of the original five defendants reached a settlement with the plaintiffs, with two of them reportedly agreeing to pay the plaintiffs $22.5 million.2

The defendants had argued that the Chinese Chamber of Commerce of Medicines and Health Products Importers & Exporters was a part of the Ministry of Commerce of the People's Republic of China (MOFCOM), and that they were thus legally required to act in accordance with the Chamber's rules. Under American law, in some

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from