Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 APRIL 2014

FTC Continues Aggressive Posture On Reverse Payment Settlement Agreements With Reference To Disgorgement

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Contributor
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

The FTC reaffirmed its intention aggressively to pursue reverse-payment patent settlement agreements in the pharmaceutical industry.

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

In two recent statements, the FTC reaffirmed its intention aggressively to pursue reverse-payment patent settlement agreements in the pharmaceutical industry. 

First, Commission officials stated that they are currently combing through previous pharmaceutical settlement agreements to determine quickly which cases to pursue following the Supreme Court's 2013 ruling in FTC v Actavis that reverse payment settlements – also known as "pay-for-delay" settlements – are not immune from antitrust scrutiny.  Second, the head of the FTC's Bureau of Competition stated that the Commission will consider "a range of remedies" and will seek "whatever relief is necessary" in any particular case, including "disgorgement," i.e., requiring companies to give up profits obtained illegally.  The Director indicated that the FTC hopes to obtain a billion dollar settlement in at least one pay-for-delay case this year. 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from