Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 AUGUST 2026

DOJ Merger Investigation Closure Credits AI Competition And Highlights Targeted Second Request Reviews

A&O Shearman
A&O Shearman
Contributor

A&O Shearman

Introducing A&O Shearman Unparalleled global depth for a changing world. Today more than ever,...

View firm profile
Explore more from A&O Shearman

The U.S. Department of Justice recently closed its investigation into a merger between two leading sales enablement software providers, citing AI competition as a key protective factor against potential competitive harm. This decision offers important insights into how antitrust agencies are evaluating AI-native companies as competitive constraints and implementing more efficient, targeted merger review processes in technology sector transactions.

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

Reasoning that growing AI competition would protect against the risk of potential competitive harm in the sales enablement software space, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) recently announced closure of its investigation into a proposed merger between Seismic Software, Inc. and Highspot Inc., two of the leading sales enablement software providers. In doing so, the DOJ appears to have embraced its commitment to efficiently focus in-depth merger reviews on key issues and defenses in an effort to short-circuit the merger review timeline.

It is not often that the DOJ publicly provides its rationale for closing merger investigations. When it does, it is usually for especially high profile or politically sensitive transactions. It is unlikely that this transaction was viewed in either sense within the DOJ. So, the DOJ’s decision to publicly explain its closing decision for this transaction is particularly interesting, especially as it relates to AI competition in the technology sector

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from