Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 OCTOBER 2026

FTC's Changing Model Raises Questions About Its Mission

The Federal Trade Commission faces fundamental questions about its institutional identity as recent Supreme Court decisions reshape its traditional model of independence and administrative adjudication. As FTC leadership embraces greater presidential accountability and shifts toward federal court litigation, the agency must demonstrate how its distinct statutory mission—particularly its unique Section 5 authority over unfair methods of competition—justifies maintaining two separate federal

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

In a Sept. 14 speech on the Federal Trade Commission's "model, mission and future," Commissioner Mark Meador argued that the FTC's traditional institutional model has "threatened to overshadow" its underlying mission.1

Meanwhile, Chairman Andrew Ferguson has signaled that the commission is moving away from its internal administrative adjudicatory process and toward federal court litigation, while embracing more direct presidential supervision of the agency.

In recent speeches and statements, FTC leaders have sketched out a vision of an agency that operates differently from its recent past but continues to play a distinct role as a competition and consumer protection enforcer.

However, both officials continue to defend a distinct role for the FTC as an antitrust enforcer alongside the U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division, and Ferguson has pushed back against recent proposals to consolidate federal antitrust enforcement within the DOJ.2

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from