Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 OCTOBER 2009

Recent Decision Serves As Stark Reminder To Revise Bespoke Contracts Regularly

The recent decision of “William Hare Limited v Shepherd Construction Limited [2009] EWHC 1603 (TCC”) serves as a stark reminder that bespoke contracts need to be revised regularly rather than seen as a finished product and never revisited.

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction
Steven Carey
Steven Carey
Fiona Edmond
Fiona Edmond

The recent decision of William Hare Limited v Shepherd Construction Limited [2009] EWHC 1603 (TCC) serves as a stark reminder that bespoke contracts need to be revised regularly rather than seen as a finished product and never revisited. 

The Enterprise Act 2002 has provided that an insolvent company can go into administration through a self-certification process.  This was not a procedure recognised under the Insolvency Act 1986. 

Shepherd had entered into a sub-contract with William Hare to supply and erect steelwork on a development project in Wakefield.  Shepherd attempt to rely upon a pay when paid provision as is permitted by the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 in cases of insolvency.     

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from