ARTICLE · 01 OCTOBER 2026
Property Litigation Cases Round-Up: August 2026
August 2026 brought significant developments in property litigation, from the Upper Tribunal's willingness to discharge restrictive covenants that no longer serve practical purposes, to the Supreme Court's landmark ruling limiting technical challenges to Right to Manage claims. These decisions reshape how landlords, leaseholders, and developers navigate covenant disputes, service charge recovery, and RTM procedures.
United KingdomReal Estate and Construction
August delivered a number of interesting property litigation decisions.
Here are the cases that caught our eye. First, two cases which show that the courts can and will remove covenants that no longer secure a practical benefit of substantial value:
1. Domus Living Ltd v Edward VII Estates Ltd
In Domus Living Ltd v Edward VII Estates Ltd [2026] UKUT 287 (LC), the owner of a property built a substantially larger house than permitted by a restrictive covenant and then applied to have the covenant discharged. The objector argued that the breach could affect future development opportunities elsewhere on the wider estate.
The Upper Tribunal found there was no real evidence of loss, no meaningful practical benefit being protected by the covenant, and no reason why the covenant should remain in place. The covenant was discharged without compensation.
We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
View source