Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 MAY 2019

Make Sure You Get It In Writing

The claim in a recent case arose in relation to whether the occupants of commercial premises had a right to a tenancy.

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

The claim in a recent case arose in relation to whether the occupants of commercial premises had a right to a tenancy. The claimants argued that they were the lawful tenant of the premises pursuant either to a 10-year oral lease or a periodic tenancy. In either scenario, it was contended that the tenancy was a business tenancy, subject to and protected by security of tenure.

The court struck out the claim to a 10-year oral lease. It reasoned that leases of land for more than three years are void for the purpose of creating a legal estate unless made by deed. In addition, in order for there to be a valid contract relating to land, such a contract is required to be in writing in a document setting out all the terms which this was not.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from